| 153 | 0 | 203 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
奥巴马时期的“亚太再平衡”战略,虽未明确使用“印太”概念,但其核心框架奠定了美国印太战略基础。特朗普2017年正式提出“印太战略”,2019年6月美国国防部发布《印太战略报告》将其系统化。经拜登政府修改后,《美国印太战略报告》于2022年2月11日正式发布。其核心是遏制中国在亚太地区的影响力,试图将西式“自由民主”价值观作为工具,以意识形态划界,拉拢盟友伙伴,孤立中国,重构亚太地区的政治秩序。尽管小国在美国外交战略中处于相对边缘的位置,为了增强遏华力度、提升遏华效果,美国加大了对小国的援助力度,提升了援助对象和领域的针对性。千禧年挑战公司尼泊尔援助项目是美国布局自身在南亚影响力而发动的特别援助项目,该项目赋予了美国在尼拥有绝对主导权、超越尼泊尔主权等特权,也让美国在对尼发展与印度和中国的关系上有了更多的话语权和控制力。该援助项目的金额只有约5亿美元,却实现了上述两个重要目标。本文旨在总结美国对小国援助策略,防范美国通过特别援助进一步扩大在亚太地区的影响力。
Abstract:Although the “Asia-Pacific Rebalancing” strategy during the Obama era did not explicitly use the concept of “Indo-Pacific”, its core framework laid the foundation for the US Indo-Pacific strategy. The strategy was proposed by the Trump administration in 2017, and the US Department of Defense released the “Indo-Pacific Strategy Report” in June 2019 to systematize it. After being revised by the Biden administration, the “US Indo-Pacific Strategy Report” was officially released on February 11, 2022. Its core is to contain China's influence in the Indo-Pacific region, trying to use Western “liberal democracy” values as a tool to draw ideological boundaries so as to draw boundaries based on ideology by working with allies and partners, isolating China and reconstructing the political order in the region. Although small countries are in a relatively marginal position in the US diplomatic strategy, in order to strengthen the containment of China and enhance the containment effect, the United States has increased its aid to small countries and improved the targeting of aid objects and fields. The Millennium Challenge Corporation( MCC) Nepal Project is a special aid project launched by the United States to curb the rise of China's influence in Southern Asia. The project gives the United States the privilege of absolute dominance in Nepal and transcending Nepal's sovereignty, and also gives the United States more voice and control in developing relations with India and China in Nepal. The amount of special aid from the United States to Nepal is only about $ 500 million, but it has achieved the above two important goals. China should summarize the experience of the United States in providing aid to small countries and prevent the United States from curbing China's influence in the Indo-Pacific region through special aid.
Ali,M.2015.The Role of Human Rights in US Foreign Aid Policy:An Assessment of US Aid to Pakistan and its Nexus with Human Rights[J].Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences(1):465-477.
Aryal,B.2024.Techno Electric and Linxon India Contracted to Build 3 Substations under MCC Project[EB/OL].Nepalkhabar,08-09,https://en.nepalkhabar.com/news/detail/10384/.
Boutton,A.2014.US Foreign Aid,Interstate Rivalry,and Incentives for Counterterrorism Cooperation[J].Journal of Peace Research(6):741-754.
Boutton,A&D.B.Carter.2014.Fair-Weather Allies?Terrorism and the Allocation of US Foreign Aid[J].Journal of Conflict Resolution(7):1144-1173.
Carcelli,S.P.2023.Bureaucracy at the Border:The Fragmentation of United States Foreign Aid[J].Journal of Conflict Resolution(7-8):1358-1386.
Constantelos,J.,P.J.Diven&H.W.Kilburn.2023.Can't Buy Me Love(with Foreign Aid)[J].Foreign Policy Analysis(4):1-21.
Department of Customs.2025.Annual Foreign Trade Statistics Book 2079-80[EB/OL].[2025-04-17].https://customs.gov.np/content/4 3/annual-foreign-trade-statistics-book-2079-80/2075-76/2076-77/2077-78/2078-79/#.
Early,B.R.&A.Jadoon.2019.Using the Carrot as the Stick:US Foreign Aid and the Effectiveness of Sanctions Threats[J].Foreign Policy Analysis(3):350-369.
Morgenstern,E.M.&N.M.Brown.2022.Foreign Assistance:An Introduction to U.S.Programs and Policy[EB/OL].(2022-01-10)[2025-03-25].https://www.congress.gov/cr-s-product/R40213.
Morgenthau,H.1962.A Political Theory of Foreign Aid[J].The American Political Science Review(2):301-309.
Rudloff,P.,J.M.Scott&T.Blew.2013.Countering Adversaries and Cultivating Friends:Indirect Rivalry Factors and the Allocation of US Foreign Aid[J].Cooperation and Conflict(3):401-423.
Salama,M.&R.Al-Masadeh.2022.The Soft Power of the United States Foreign Policy Towards the Middle East 2011-2021:A Case Study(Jordan&Egypt)[J].Qaafe Journal for Media Studies&Political Science(9):110-139.
Snider,E.A.2023.Marketing Democracy:The Political Economy of Democracy Aid in the Middle East[J].Political Science Quarterly(3):435-436.
U.S.Embassy Kathmandu.2022.THE MCC-NEPAL COMPACT TOP TEN FACT.[EB/OL].(2022-03-22)[2023-07-23].https://np.usembassy.gov/mcc-in-nepal-top-ten-facts/.
The Government of Nepal and MCC.2014.Nepal Growth Diagnostic[EB/OL].(2014-05-16)[2024-07-12[].https://assets.mcc.gov/content/uploads/2017/05/Nepal_CA_withCover.pdf.
The Government of Nepal and MCC.2017.Millennium Challenge Compact[EB/OL].(2017-09-14)[2024-07-12] https://assets.mcc.gov/content/uploads/compact-nepal.pdf.
Travis,R.2010.Problems,Politics,and Policy Streams:A Reconsideration US Foreign Aid Behavior toward Africa[J].International Studies Quarterly(3):797-821.
陈加敏.2023.美国与尼泊尔千年挑战协议研究[D].北京:外交学院.
戴永红,姬广礼.2021.美国千禧年挑战公司对南亚国家的援助:进展、影响与对策[J].四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)(5):65-75.
高亮.2022.从“第四点计划”到“印太战略”:美国对尼泊尔援助研究[J].南亚研究季刊(4):92-113.
宋清润,巩小豪.2021.美国国际开发署对缅甸援助研究(2001-2020财年)[J].南洋问题研究(4):1-14.
赵亮.2023.“印太战略”视角下美国对尼泊尔援助的新动向——基于美国千禧年挑战公司的案例研究[J].海外投资与出口信贷(1):43-48.
朱翠萍.2018.“印太”:概念阐释、实施的局限性与战略走势[J].印度洋经济体研究(5):1-16.
(1)数据来源:笔者根据美国对外援助官网整理,https:∥www.foreignassistance.gov,访问日期:2025年5月20日。
基本信息:
中图分类号:F171.2;F135.5;F125;D871.2;D835.5
引用信息:
[1]郭兵云,秦鸿.美国亚太小国援助战略剖析——以千禧年挑战公司尼泊尔援助项目为例[J].中外交流研究(中英文),2025,1(04):52-67.
基金信息:
四川外国语大学2022年校级研究生教育改革研究项目(yjsjg202210); 四川外国语大学研究生院新文科和国际化特色建设研究项目(SISUXWK202315)的阶段性研究成果
2025-08-15
2025-08-15