中外交流研究（中英文）

本文聚焦于国际法律援助领域长期存在的西方中心主义倾向,从权力结构与知识生产两个维度展开批判性分析,揭示西方国家主导的国际法律援助模式隐含的“捐助者—受援者”不平等关系以及西方法律范式在非西方社会实践中产生的水土不服现象。通过引入全球南方视角,文章探讨了以平等尊重、本土知识重视和需求导向为特征的去殖民化法律援助实践,并结合近年来中国等新兴国家在南南合作框架下开展的法治援助案例,归纳其在促进受援国法治能力建设、推动多元现代性发展方面的积极意义。研究指出,去殖民化法律援助在实践过程中仍面临理念差异、机制适配与效果评估等多重挑战,未来应通过强化对话机制、倡导包容性规范、构建合作网络等路径推动其优化发展。

Amidst deepening globalization, the collective rise of Global South nations is driving transformative shifts in the international order, exposing the Western-dominated model of international legal assistance to an unprecedented legitimacy crisis. This paper critically examines the persistent Western-centric tendencies in legal aid through the dual analytical lenses of power structures and knowledge production, revealing entrenched donor-recipient inequities and the incompatibility of Western legal paradigms with non-Western societal contexts. By adopting a Global South perspective, the study explores decolonial approaches to legal assistance characterized by equal respect, the valuation of indigenous knowledge, and demand-driven cooperation. Through case studies of China and other emerging economies' rule-of-law initiatives under South-South cooperation frameworks, the research highlights their positive role in strengthening recipient countries' legal capacity and fostering pluriversal modernities. The analysis further identifies implementation challenges, including conceptual divergences, institutional mismatches, and impact measurement difficulties, proposing pathways for improvement through enhanced dialogue mechanisms, inclusive norm-building, and collaborative networks.